What follows is by far my biggest objection to ID:
Ok, fine! Let's assume assume that evolution is just a theory based on speculations(false), and so you advocate Intelligent Design. What you should realise is that the new theory should be better at explaining and predicting natural phenomenon than the theory it is replacing. It should be a testable consistent theory, atleast more testable than the replaced theory.
I don't see either of the criteria being satisfied. There!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment